You are currently browsing the Seeking Logos weblog archives for February, 2009.
- 2-dimensionalism (2)
- Admin (2)
- Afghanistan (1)
- Annotated Bibliography (2)
- Art (1)
- Barefoot (1)
- Bish (1)
- Causation (2)
- Computation (1)
- Conferences (2)
- Consciousness (1)
- Dan Issler (1)
- DoD (1)
- Early Modern (1)
- Epistemology (1)
- Ethics (5)
- Exphi (1)
- Free Will (1)
- Georgia State University (1)
- Grad School (10)
- Iran (2)
- Iraq (1)
- Kant (4)
- Kraut (1)
- Leibniz (1)
- Mathematics (1)
- Metaphysics (4)
- Moral Psych (1)
- Papers (4)
- Perspectivalism (1)
- PhilMind (4)
- philosophy of language (1)
- PhilSci (1)
- Plato (1)
- Politics (2)
- Reasons for Action (2)
- Relativism (1)
- The Republic (1)
- Thesis (2)
- Twitter (1)
- Uncategorized (11)
- Widsom (1)
- 14. July 2010: New Blog
- 8. June 2010: Barefoot Running worries
- 9. May 2010: Do we have a word for this?
- 4. May 2010: Flashmob at Ohio State
- 3. May 2010: "If i'm not mistaken...."
- 24. April 2010: Why be barefoot?
- 20. April 2010: Two posts I want to write in the near future, and a silly question about deodorant
- 16. April 2010: What the first-personal-perspectival-realist might say about 'disagreement'.
- 30. March 2010: ED, HD, and fatness
- 27. March 2010: Icelandic Strip Clubs
Archive for February 2009
My Argument about Pizza and God
12. February 2009 by Raleigh Miller.
I’m writing a paper right now that I’m pretty excited about. One in which I actually come to the defense of Divine Command Theory. The allegedly damning argument contra DCT says “If God has reasons for commanding some action A, than it is God’s reasons, and not God’s having commanded thusly, which make A morally correct.” Put that together with a line about how if God doesn’t have reasons, he’s arbitrary, and morality can’t be arbitrary, and you seem to have put the nail in the coffin, wrapped the DCTist in an inescapable dilemma. I think both of those premises are false. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Ethics | No Comments »