You are currently browsing the Seeking Logos weblog archives for February, 2009.
- 2-dimensionalism (2)
- Admin (2)
- Afghanistan (1)
- Annotated Bibliography (2)
- Art (1)
- Bish (1)
- Causation (2)
- Computation (1)
- Conferences (2)
- Consciousness (1)
- Dan Issler (1)
- Early Modern (1)
- Epistemology (1)
- Ethics (5)
- Exphi (1)
- Free Will (1)
- Georgia State University (1)
- Grad School (10)
- Iran (2)
- Iraq (1)
- Kant (4)
- Kraut (1)
- Leibniz (1)
- Mathematics (1)
- Metaphysics (2)
- Papers (4)
- PhilMind (4)
- philosophy of language (1)
- PhilSci (1)
- Politics (2)
- Reasons for Action (2)
- Thesis (2)
- Twitter (1)
- Uncategorized (2)
- Widsom (1)
- 16. January 2010: The Social Value of the Gift Card
- 28. December 2009: Leibniz On Causation
- 11. December 2009: Universalism and Reasons
- 9. December 2009: "Reasons and Reason" Final Draft Submitted
- 7. December 2009: Seeking Logos Welcomes Nathan Smith
- 23. November 2009: Would anyone like to be a contributor?
- 22. November 2009: "Reasons and Reason" Draft
- 3. November 2009: Footstamping for the consistency of imaginative states
- 2. November 2009: On the war in Afghanistan
- 1. November 2009: Kant and Mathematical Judgments
Archive for February 2009
My Argument about Pizza and God
12. February 2009 by Raleigh Miller.
I’m writing a paper right now that I’m pretty excited about. One in which I actually come to the defense of Divine Command Theory. The allegedly damning argument contra DCT says “If God has reasons for commanding some action A, than it is God’s reasons, and not God’s having commanded thusly, which make A morally correct.” Put that together with a line about how if God doesn’t have reasons, he’s arbitrary, and morality can’t be arbitrary, and you seem to have put the nail in the coffin, wrapped the DCTist in an inescapable dilemma. I think both of those premises are false. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Ethics | No Comments »