You are currently browsing the archives for the Reasons for Action category.
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Jan | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||
- 2-dimensionalism (2)
- Admin (2)
- Afghanistan (1)
- Annotated Bibliography (2)
- Art (1)
- Bish (1)
- Causation (2)
- Computation (1)
- Conferences (2)
- Consciousness (1)
- Dan Issler (1)
- Early Modern (1)
- Epistemology (1)
- Ethics (5)
- Exphi (1)
- Free Will (1)
- Georgia State University (1)
- Grad School (10)
- Iran (2)
- Iraq (1)
- Kant (4)
- Kraut (1)
- Leibniz (1)
- Mathematics (1)
- Metaphysics (2)
- Papers (4)
- PhilMind (4)
- philosophy of language (1)
- PhilSci (1)
- Politics (2)
- Reasons for Action (2)
- Thesis (2)
- Twitter (1)
- Uncategorized (2)
- Widsom (1)
- 16. January 2010: The Social Value of the Gift Card
- 28. December 2009: Leibniz On Causation
- 11. December 2009: Universalism and Reasons
- 9. December 2009: "Reasons and Reason" Final Draft Submitted
- 7. December 2009: Seeking Logos Welcomes Nathan Smith
- 23. November 2009: Would anyone like to be a contributor?
- 22. November 2009: "Reasons and Reason" Draft
- 3. November 2009: Footstamping for the consistency of imaginative states
- 2. November 2009: On the war in Afghanistan
- 1. November 2009: Kant and Mathematical Judgments
Archive for the Reasons for Action Category
Universalism and Reasons
11. December 2009 by Nathan.
This post is going to be pretty inchoate; it’s just going to be me putting down some thoughts I’ve been having on how to make sense of the claim that morality is universal.
Posted in Reasons for Action, Ethics | No Comments »
“Reasons and Reason” Final Draft Submitted
9. December 2009 by Raleigh Miller.
I’ve submitted my final draft for Dr. Svavarsdottir’s seminar on reasons for action. The final(ish) draft can be found on the “Raleigh’s stuff” page.It’s not my best paper, but it’s my first as a PhD student; that’s rather exciting I think.My thanks to Dan Issler, Ben Sheredos, Paul Pfeilscheifter, Dan Burnston and Justin Bernstein. Their comments were incisive and insightful; I was only able to improve the paper so much, and I think some of their most penetrating concerns remain concerning, but the paper is certainly far better than it was for their contribution.
Posted in Reasons for Action, Papers, Ethics, Grad School | No Comments »