You are currently browsing the archives for the Reasons for Action category.
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Jul | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | ||
- 2-dimensionalism (2)
- Admin (2)
- Afghanistan (1)
- Annotated Bibliography (2)
- Art (1)
- Barefoot (1)
- Bish (1)
- Causation (2)
- Computation (1)
- Conferences (2)
- Consciousness (1)
- Dan Issler (1)
- DoD (1)
- Early Modern (1)
- Epistemology (1)
- Ethics (5)
- Exphi (1)
- Free Will (1)
- Georgia State University (1)
- Grad School (10)
- Iran (2)
- Iraq (1)
- Kant (4)
- Kraut (1)
- Leibniz (1)
- Mathematics (1)
- Metaphysics (4)
- Moral Psych (1)
- Papers (4)
- Perspectivalism (1)
- PhilMind (4)
- philosophy of language (1)
- PhilSci (1)
- Plato (1)
- Politics (2)
- Reasons for Action (2)
- Relativism (1)
- The Republic (1)
- Thesis (2)
- Twitter (1)
- Uncategorized (11)
- Widsom (1)
- 14. July 2010: New Blog
- 8. June 2010: Barefoot Running worries
- 9. May 2010: Do we have a word for this?
- 4. May 2010: Flashmob at Ohio State
- 3. May 2010: "If i'm not mistaken...."
- 24. April 2010: Why be barefoot?
- 20. April 2010: Two posts I want to write in the near future, and a silly question about deodorant
- 16. April 2010: What the first-personal-perspectival-realist might say about 'disagreement'.
- 30. March 2010: ED, HD, and fatness
- 27. March 2010: Icelandic Strip Clubs
Archive for the Reasons for Action Category
Universalism and Reasons
11. December 2009 by Nathan.
This post is going to be pretty inchoate; it’s just going to be me putting down some thoughts I’ve been having on how to make sense of the claim that morality is universal.
Posted in Reasons for Action, Ethics | No Comments »
“Reasons and Reason” Final Draft Submitted
9. December 2009 by Raleigh Miller.
I’ve submitted my final draft for Dr. Svavarsdottir’s seminar on reasons for action. The final(ish) draft can be found on the “Raleigh’s stuff” page.It’s not my best paper, but it’s my first as a PhD student; that’s rather exciting I think.My thanks to Dan Issler, Ben Sheredos, Paul Pfeilscheifter, Dan Burnston and Justin Bernstein. Their comments were incisive and insightful; I was only able to improve the paper so much, and I think some of their most penetrating concerns remain concerning, but the paper is certainly far better than it was for their contribution.
Posted in Reasons for Action, Papers, Ethics, Grad School | No Comments »